Written by Real innovation begins when someone looks at a familiar force and refuses to believe we have already seen its highest potential. That is what makes Mike Corbin’s Motoflux so compelling. Corbin is not approaching this space as a casual observer. He brings decades of invention, product development, and electric-vehicle experimentation to the table, from his work in the motorcycle industry to his role in the early Sparrow EV.
What sets Motoflux apart is its attempt to rethink how motion is created inside a motor. According to Motoflux’s public description, the device uses a three-component architecture that includes a radial director designed to distort the magnetic lines of flux in the armature. As those flux lines seek to shorten and tighten, the armature is drawn toward the next closest pole tip of the stator, producing rotational torque. That is the core idea that gives the device its identity and makes it stand out from conventional motor language.
Here is a video of the motors input and output measurements
The reason this draws attention is simple: Motoflux is not presented as a minor efficiency tweak. It is presented as a fundamentally different way of directing magnetic force to create motion. In its 2023 public announcement, Motoflux said its proof-of-concept motor generated rotational energy directly from permanent magnets and reported torque output increases ranging from 4x to 25x over input. Those are Motoflux’s own published claims, and they are exactly the kind of claims that naturally spark both excitement and scrutiny.
That tension is part of what makes the story powerful.
Whether one sees Motoflux as a breakthrough in progress, a bold engineering experiment, or a challenge to conventional assumptions, the design represents something larger than one device. It represents the mindset that still drives invention forward: the willingness to question accepted limitations, test unfamiliar ideas, and pursue better ways of converting force into usable motion. In a world full of incremental updates, Motoflux draws attention because it aims for something much bigger.
Mike Corbin’s Motoflux reminds us that the future of engineering is not shaped only by those who refine existing systems. It is also shaped by those willing to step outside them, study the forces everyone else takes for granted, and ask a harder question:
What else is possible here?
I wonder if this could be utilised to at least partially overcome magnetic braking in generators.
Love your content. Which is the best method to produce 100 to 200 amps? Enough to run a single family home?
Great question. I opened a dedicated Resonate369 thread for this here:
https://friendbeacon.com/groups-2/resonate369/forum/topic/off-grid-power-questions-loads-storage-generation/#post-2264
Short version: start by sizing the loads first. 100 to 200 amps can mean about 12 kW to 48 kW depending on whether you are talking 120V or 240V and whether that is peak or continuous draw.
Post your target voltage, peak load, continuous load, estimated kWh/day, surge loads, existing equipment, and runtime goal in that thread and we can work through practical sizing. For high-current home power, wire size, breakers, grounding, transfer equipment, and qualified electrical help matter.
I have been in prototype mode for months now my biggest problem is funding especially for a grant to build the first of its kind auto generator that’s electromagnetic. the core of this generator is unique and never been done before. all my research and math add up just building it is the proof of concept. was hopping you could connect with me and get me pointed in the right direction etc. also would like to collaborate on future projects.
please contact me by email.